Jack “The Paki-Basher” Straw
January 10, 2011By CoolnessofHind
In boxing, fighters use a suffix; an adjective in their names to instil fear in the heart of the person he is fighting. For example Manny Pacquiao is fearfully known to his foes as Manny “The Destroyer” Pacquiao. Jack it seems, is changing his title from Jack “the Opportunist” Straw to Jack “the Paki-basher” straw. The bigoted bashing of course is a verbal one, but still a bashing nonetheless.
Jack in a recent Newsnight episode made statements stereotyping Pakistanis to be white chick-chasers. Recall, that this man is a cunning, sly opportunist who unlike the boxers, has no sense of honour. First he sparked the Niqab controversy, thus jeopardising the security of Muslim women, and then, like a poodle begging for acceptance four years later apologises for the negative perception of Muslim Niqabi women he helped stir. This of course it seems he did to win some sort of sympathy from the Muslim community and win votes. The man is a shrewd fox, to say the least.
It reminds one of the following Malcolm X quote,
“I have more respect for a man who lets me know where he stands than the one who comes up like an angel but is nothing but a devil.”
Jack, “the Paki-Basher” Straw seems to fit the persona of the second person. It is like stabbing Muslims, then apologising to them, and then stabbing them again for good measure.
Ignoring the validity of the claim made by Jack “the Paki Basher” Straw (and the demographical factor), people of all sorts of backgrounds engage in all sorts of filth. Islam21C already have used the analogy which first came to my mind when I heard his statements. It is like claiming pedophilia is the hallmark of the whites. You could narrow it further: pedophilia is the hallmark of the Europeans. And further: pedophilia is the hallmark of the Christian Priests. The same could apply to incestuous pedophilia and other profane acts which contradicts the morality of the upright.
Further, Ummah Pulse neatly confounds Jack “the Paki-Basher” straw further by quoting the following Criminal statistics:
“Table 5.4b of this pdf shows that, in the latest year for which we have data, Lancashire police arrested 627 people for sexual offences. 0.3% of these were Pakistanis. That’s two people. 85.5% were white British. In Lancashire, there are 1,296,900 white Brits and 45,000 Pakistanis. This means that 4.163 per 10,000 white Brits were arrested for a sex crime, compared to 0.44 Pakistanis. If you’re a journalist, you might say that the chances of being arrested for a sex crime are nine times greater if you’re white than Pakistani.”
So Jack, who upper-cutted you into making such hate-stirring statements? The BNP?
The ISSM Blog 
I wonder how long it’ll take society will deem it acceptable for a boxers to add, “Paki-basher” or even the increasingly popular “Muslim Hunter” to their credentials.
Jack straw’s comment is absolutely disgraceful. Again this clearly shows their agenda to demonise the Muslims. He may have said pakistani but only because there was no way he could have said Muslim and got away with it with such little fuss. Throughout the ‘debate’ they mention Pakistani and Muslim communities interchangeably highlighting their main agenda.
Its ridiculous to say ‘we are going to solve the problem of child grooming by questioning the minority of pakistanis, which make up 0.3% (or whatever the figure for UK is) of offenders of this crime, about what are the causes for the lead up to this crime.’
As stated by the Det Sgt in ths video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zj7HBkLKco&feature=related they would have missed 80% of the offenders had they been looking for pakistanis committing this crime.
Im going to exercise my ‘freedom of speech’ and say the cause of this is the British themselves, you wanted integration you got it, they’re doing just as you are. I can prove this, you just have to look at the british soldiers who are fighting for this country and represent everything british who are raping the young girls and women in iraq and afghanistan. That combined with the alarming figures of white male rapists in this country leads to a more justified conclusion that the problem is with the white people themselves and it has something to do with their culture and how they perceive women. Douglas Murray would have been more correct in saying it is endemic in the white community rather than suggesting it is endemic in the pakistanis and then trying to backtrack
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/jack-straws-brother-found-guilty-of-indecent-assault-on-girl-16-698881.html#Scene_1
maybe jack straw needs to look closer to home and ask himself questions before asking questions of others